The state government is facing sharp criticism from writers, artists and cultural activists who allege that the Language, Art and Culture Department has been pushed into “complete neglect” under the present dispensation.
Members of the literary fraternity claim that the department, which is responsible for preserving and promoting the rich linguistic and cultural heritage of the state, has been reduced to a “silent office” with little visible activity on the ground. They point out that in recent months there have been no major literary festivals, state-level seminars, poetry gatherings or meaningful cultural outreach programmes.
Critics say that while other departments actively showcase achievements and roll out public-facing initiatives, the Language and Culture Department appears directionless. “A government that speaks of heritage and identity cannot afford to ignore the very department meant to protect it,” a senior writer remarked.
Allegations have also surfaced that proposals meant to secure financial assistance from the Centre are not being pursued aggressively. Sources claim that opportunities under central cultural schemes are either delayed at the departmental level or not recommended properly, resulting in the state missing out on funds and national platforms.
There are further concerns about administrative functioning within the department. Members of the cultural community allege lack of coordination between the political leadership and senior officers, absence of regular review meetings, and no clear roadmap for strengthening literary institutions.
Several writers have openly questioned whether the department is being given due priority by the government. “Language and culture cannot survive on speeches alone. They require vision, funding and consistent engagement,” said a representative of a literary body.
The growing resentment has led to calls for immediate intervention by the concerned minister and top bureaucrats. Stakeholders are demanding a comprehensive review, revival of stalled programmes, transparent handling of proposals, and a structured annual calendar of cultural events.
Observers warn that continued neglect could have long-term consequences for the preservation of regional languages, folk traditions and literary heritage. With the state known for its rich cultural identity, many believe that restoring the department’s credibility and functionality should be treated as an urgent priority rather than an afterthought.
